Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scialfa, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Skaloud, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scialfa, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Skaloud, P.

Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol 55, Issue 1 P27-P46, Copyright © 2000 by The Gerontological Society of America


ARTICLES

Aging and the development of automaticity in conjunction search

CT Scialfa, L Jenkins, E Hamaluk and P Skaloud
University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. scialfa@aucalgary.ca

In two experiments, younger and older observers carried out feature searches for targets defined by their luminance contrast and orientation. Additionally, they received consistent-mapping (CM) training in luminance contrast by orientation conjunction search, followed by a brief exposure to conjunction search under reversal conditions. In Experiment 1, display size effects on reaction time suggested that both younger and older observers were conducting a parallel search in all conditions and showed equivalent disruption at reversal. Experiment 2 was a substantive replication of the first using more difficult conjunction search displays. In addition to latency, we measured the number, duration, and feature-based selectivity of fixations made during conjunction search. Display size effects were larger than in Experiment 2 and were of equivalent magnitude in younger and older people. There were no age differences in improvement in conjunction search and minimal age differences in disruption following reversal. Both age groups demonstrated early in training that they could select items possessing target features (i.e., the color white), and both age groups demonstrated that they could not completely reverse this selectivity when these features no longer defined the target. These experiments have several implications for models of visual attention and age differences therein.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
G. Ho and C. T. Scialfa
Age, Skill Transfer, and Conjunction Search
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., May 1, 2002; 57(3): P277 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2000 by The Gerontological Society of America.