Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 55:S234-S244 (2000)
© 2000 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Dimensions of Care for Dementia Sufferers in Long-Term Care Institutions

Are They Related to Outcomes?

Neena L. Chappella,b and R. Colin Reida

a Centre on Aging, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
b Department of Sociology, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Neena L. Chappell, Director, Centre on Aging, Sedgewick Building, Rm. A104, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada E-mail: nlc{at}uvic.ca.

Objectives. This study empirically examined whether dimensions of care cluster in special care units (SCUs) compared with non-SCUs. The relationship between SCU status plus separate measures of the dimensions of care and outcomes for dementia sufferers was then investigated.

Methods. Data were drawn from the Intermediate Care Facility Project. The sample () included residents with dementia, aged 65 and older, in intermediate care facilities throughout the province of British Columbia, Canada. Longitudinal data included 6 outcomes: cognitive function, behavioral problems of agitation and social skills, physical functioning, and quality of life measured through affect and expressive language skills. Separate multiple linear regression equations were estimated, relating each of these outcomes to 5 dimensions of care: preadmission and admission procedures, staff training and education, nonuse of physical and chemical restraints, flexible care routines and resident-relevant activities, and the environment.

Results. The results showed there is virtually no clustering of dimensions along SCU/non-SCU lines. Neither SCU status nor the individual dimensions were highly predictive of outcomes. Residents' affect at t1 emerged as a characteristic that was significantly correlated with other outcomes.

Discussion. This Canadian research can be added to the few but growing number of rigorous studies that suggest SCUs are not homogeneous and do not necessarily provide better care than non-SCUs. Moreover, it raises questions about the benefits of "best practice" dimensions of care, regardless of SCU status.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
J. J. Jalbert, L. A. Daiello, and K. L. Lapane
Dementia of the Alzheimer Type
Epidemiol. Rev., November 1, 2008; 30(1): 15 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. Hyde, R. Perez, and B. Forester
Dementia and Assisted Living
Gerontologist, December 1, 2007; 47(suppl_1): 51 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
R. Colin Reid and N. L. Chappell
Staff Ratios and Resident Outcomes in Special Care Units: Do Activity Aides Make a Difference?
Journal of Applied Gerontology, February 1, 2003; 22(1): 89 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. B. Tornatore and L. A. Grant
Burden Among Family Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer's Disease in Nursing Homes
Gerontologist, August 1, 2002; 42(4): 497 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by The Gerontological Society of America.