Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ekerdt, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by DeViney, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ekerdt, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by DeViney, S.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 56:S162-S170 (2001)
© 2001 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Eddies in the Stream

The Prevalence of Uncertain Plans for Retirement

David J. Ekerdta, Jennifer Hackneya, Karl Kosloskib and Stanley DeVineyc

a Department of Sociology, University of Kansas, Lawrence
b Department of Gerontology, University of Nebraska at Omaha
c Department of Social Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne

David J. Ekerdt, Gerontology Center, 3050 Dole Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045-2930 E-mail: dekerdt{at}ukans.edu.

Objective. This study examined an assumption of retirement theory that typifies older workers as preretirees who are planfully engaged in paths toward retirement.

Methods. Using survey responses among workers in the 1992 and 1994 waves of the Health and Retirement Study, we described the prevalence of nonsubstantive answers to questions about the expected form and timing of retirement (e.g., "don't know," "haven't thought about it"). We tested explanations for this uncertainty as an artifact of the survey process, but also as an outcome of the opportunity structure for retirement planning.

Results. Survey procedure did generate some of these noncommittal responses. Depending on question type, approximately 10% to 40% of workers did not state when or how they would retire, and such responses were less prevalent across age and time. In addition, categorical uncertainty about form and timing was theoretically predictable in a framework that supposed that workers less subject to a socially attended life—at work or away—would be more undecided about the future.

Discussion. Uncertainty is an authentic, meaningful stance toward retirement that theory and research design should not ignore. Just as actual transitions to retirement can be ambiguous or blurred, the expectation of retirement, as well, can be untidy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
J. M. Raymo and M. M. Sweeney
Work-family conflict and retirement preferences.
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., May 1, 2006; 61(3): S161 - S169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
D. J. Ekerdt and J. K. Hackney
Workers' Ignorance of Retirement Benefits
Gerontologist, August 1, 2002; 42(4): 543 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2001 by The Gerontological Society of America.