Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiori, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Antonucci, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiori, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Antonucci, T. C.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 62:P322-P330 (2007)
© 2007 The Gerontological Society of America

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Social Network Types Among Older Adults: A Multidimensional Approach

Katherine L. Fiori, Jacqui Smith and Toni C. Antonucci

1 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
2 Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin.

Address correspondence to K. Fiori, Postdoctoral Researcher, Intercultural Institute of Human Development and Aging at Long Island University, 191 Willoughby Street, Suite 1A, Brooklyn, NY 11201. E-mail: katherine.fiori{at}liu.edu. Co-author e-mails: smitjacq{at}isr.umich.edu (Jacqui Smith) and tca{at}umich.edu (Toni Antonucci)

Theories of social relations suggest that individuals' personal networks reflect multiple aspects of relationships, and that different constellations are more or less supportive of well-being. Using data from the Berlin Aging Study (N = 516; age, M = 85 years), we derived network types that reflect information about structure, function, and quality, and we examined their association with well-being. A cluster analysis revealed six network types: diverse–supported, family focused, friend focused–supported, friend focused–unsupported, restricted–nonfriends–unsatisfied, and restricted–nonfamily–unsupported. Well-being was predicted differentially by the six types. Although the oldest-old individuals (85 years of age or older) were overrepresented in the friend-focused–supported and restricted types, age did not moderate the association of types with well-being. A holistic consideration of structure, function, and quality of social networks in old age offers unique insights.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2007 by The Gerontological Society of America.