Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goffaux, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pushkar, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goffaux, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pushkar, D.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 63:P57-P66 (2008)
© 2008 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Neurophysiological Measures of Task-Set Switching: Effects of Working Memory and Aging

Philippe Goffaux, Natalie A. Phillips, Marco Sinai and Dolores Pushkar

1 Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
2 Centre for Research in Human Development, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
3 Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research/Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Address correspondence to Natalie A. Phillips, PhD, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Centre for Research in Human Development, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H4B 1R6. E-mail: Natalie.Phillips{at}concordia.ca

We investigated age-related differences in task-switching performance by using behavioral measures and event-related brain potentials. We tested younger and older adults, and we separated older adults into groups with high and low working memory (WM); that is, we separated them into old–high-WM and old–low-WM groups. On average, all participants responded more slowly in mixed-task than in single-task blocks (i.e., reaction time or RT mixing cost). Younger adults and old–high-WM participants had equivalent RT mixing costs and showed larger posterior negative slow-wave activity when preparing for mixed trials than for single-task trials, suggesting that mixed-task trials required trial-to-trial preparation. Old–high-WM participants also showed frontally distributed activity on mixed-task trials, suggesting their use of executive control to offset age-related differences in mixed-task preparation. In contrast, old-low-WM participants had large RT mixing costs and large posterior event-related brain potential negativities during single-task trials, suggesting that they prepare during single- and mixed-task blocks. High WM, therefore, may help older adults offset the age-related difficulties often observed when they are task switching.

Key Words: Task switching • Mixing cost • Working memory • Event-related brain potentials • Negative slow wave







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2008 by The Gerontological Society of America.